Scandalous Activists Attack OCA Synod For Rejecting Same-Sex Unions and LGBTQ Identities

Scandalous Activists Attack OCA Synod For Rejecting Same-Sex Unions and LGBTQ Identitiesby Fr. Ioannes Apiarius –
Faith is Fear, Tradition is Tyranny, Sin is Virtue, Truth is Falsehood, Order is Oppression

An Orwellian, ungodly spirit continues to engulf and embolden homosexual and academic activists (inside and outside the Orthodox Church) who seek to normalize homosexuality, legitimize “gay marriage,” and incorporate the LGBTQ madness in the teaching, practice, theology, and sacramental life of the Orthodox Church.

To counter and call to repentance those deceptive voices, the OCA Synod, at the latest All American Council of the Orthodox Church in America, issued a clear and direct statement that categorically rejects same-sex unions and any of the false LGBTQ sexual identities that contradict the right order and theology of the Orthodox Christian faith: “We reject any attempt to create a theological framework which would normalize same-sex erotic relationships or distort humanity’s God-given sexual identity.”

Professor Edith M. Humphrey accurately describes the Synod’s pastoral approach: “the welcome words of our God-fearing fathers are marked by a courage that sets us free for fruitful and faithful exploration of the mystery of human sexuality, by a generous inclusiveness that calls all to a life of repentance and humility, and by a clarity of vision that shines a guiding light for the faithful in a time of great anthropological confusion….We are thankful to the bishops for setting us on such a firm foundation, with welcoming but wise words, and in holding to the life-giving words that we have received in the Scriptures and in the fathers.”

The outrage from the progressive activists was swift and predictable. Several deceitful missives, full of unjustified accusations, distortions, and mischaracterizations, were published by Inga Leonova (The Wheel), Gregory Tucker (Public Orthodoxy), Giacomo Sanfilippo (Orthodoxy in Dialogue), Sarah Riccardi-Swartz, Katherine Kelaidis, and Dcn. Nicholas Denysenko (Public Orthodoxy).

(See key excerpts from the unrepentant activists reproduced at the bottom of this post.)

There is no hint of remorse or repentance from those who embrace the LGBTQ ideology and misuse the calls to “dialogue” and “academic freedom” as excuses to legitimize disordered sexuality and normalize homosexual sins within the Orthodox Church. “Those who are seeking to normalize same-sex relations within the historic Church have charged our good bishops with fearful oppression, callous exclusion of those struggling with sexual passions, and lack of pastoral concern for their flocks,” observes Professor Humphrey in her analysis. She rightly states that there’s not truth or legitimacy to those wild accusations.

For those unfamiliar with these false teachers, here are several self-explanatory summaries:

Inga Leonova is the creator and editor-in-chief of The Wheel. She’s an outspoken critic of the moral teaching of the Holy Orthodox Church. She frequently attacks and defames Orthodox Christian priests and bishops who preach and defend the right theology of the Orthodox Church. Inga wants women to be priests and bishops, has repeatedly declared that homosexual activity is not sinful, and she fully supports the LGTBQ agenda. She is also an advocate for welcoming same-sex couples into the sacramental life of the Orthodox Church.

Gregory Tucker is a graduate of St. Vladimir’s Seminary and PhD student of Fordham University. He is on The Wheel’s editorial board. He’s also a regular contributor to Public Orthodoxy (run by George Demacopolous and Aristotle Papanikolaou). Tucker is involved in a homosexual “marriage” with a former hieromonk who gave up his priesthood and broke his monastic vows to live with Tucker. Tucker is a homosexual activist who fights to shove the LGBTQ agenda inside the Orthodox Church.

Giacomo Sanfilippo (also known as Peter J. Sanfilippo) is a former Orthodox priest who was defrocked for inappropriate homosexual behavior (suspended from priesthood in 1995, divorced in 1999, deposed in 2002). Sanfilippo is founder of the Orthodoxy in Dialogue website which he has used to drive an unholy vendetta against multiple Orthodox Christian priests, bishops, and seminary professors who rightly uphold and defend the Orthodox Church teaching on homosexual sin and LGBTQ delusions. Giacomo proudly describes himself as “The Orthodox Church’s most famous living gay man” and fights to normalize homosexuality and same-sex “marriage,” and bring the transgender delusion into the Orthodox Church.

As warned several years ago, the Orthodox Church is continually attacked by false teachers and deceitful venues that question, challenge, mock, deconstruct, contradict, and distort Church teaching, practices, and theology.

That war against the true teaching and right theology of the Orthodox Church is intensifying. Emboldened by their rebellion and lack of repentance, false teachers keep escalating their assaults on the Church. They insist they are the only “legitimate, tolerant, and enlightened” guides who can “help” the Church change with the times, while they accuse faithful priests and bishops of “homophobia” and “transphobia.”

As Fr. Victor Potapov reminds us, “Christ calls men to the saving truth, whereas the devil, through his servants, i.e., the false teachers and tempters, sows ruinous falsehood and errors in the minds of men, and in their hearts sows various vices, embellishing all this with similitudes of truth and goodness.” Fr. Potapov also warns us that the “devil sows tares, says the Lord, while men sleep. In other words, the devil sows his tares secretly, unnoticeably, when the guards appointed to look after the field, that is, the pastors of the Church, keep watch inadequately, and when the faithful themselves live carelessly as well and listen too credulously to impostors and false teachers.”

Providentially, in attacking more faithful shepherds of the Church, the impostors reveal themselves as tares and hirelings who betray the Master and scatter the sheep. The Lord is allowing the faithful and rational sheep to see exactly who these darkened individuals are and how far they’ve strayed from the true teachings of the Orthodox Christian Church.

It is fitting and right that the OCA bishops have taken a stand against those who want to normalize homosexuality, push the Church to accept and bless “gay marriage,” and insist on introducing the LGBTQ delusions into the Orthodox Church.

According to Orthodox Christian theology and universal teaching, passions and sexual distortions do not define human beings. Orthodox Christians can never identify as “homosexual, gay, transsexual, queer, bisexual” or self-identify with any other sin, sexual distortion, delusion, or depravity included in the LGBTQIAWXYZ growing list of non-Christian and anti-human categories.

Orthodox Christians who believe that Jesus Christ is Lord, the Son and Word of the living God, True God of True God, the Redeemer and Saviour of all mankind, must reject the “gay” or “homosexual” or “queer” or “transsexual” other LGBTQ+ identities and labels if they want to remain in the Orthodox Church and desire to partake in Her sacramental life. Demanding that the Church accept and bless these particular sexual sins is unacceptable. It’s outright rebellion against God and the Church. (Not Gay or Homosexual, but Men and Women Created in the Image and Likeness of God)

Let’s hope and pray that the bishops follow through on their warnings and act in accordance with their stated beliefs and sacramental duties. True shepherds always stand guard and protect the sheep. Faithful shepherds confront brazen impostors and remove unrepentant false teachers who deceive the faithful and scandalize the Church.

– Fr. Ioannes Apiarius

line divider

Key Excerpts from Scandalous and Homosexual Activists

Freedom from Fear: Editorial Response to the Statement of the Holy Synod of the Orthodox Church in America
Inga Leonova & The Wheel – 7/22/2022
www.wheeljournal.com/blog/2022/7/22/on-freedom-from-fear-editorial-response-to-the-statement-of-the-holy-synod-of-the-orthodox-church-in-america

…The “Statement on Same-Sex Relationships and Sexual Identity” issued by the Holy Synod of the Orthodox Church in America on July 21, 2022, at the All-American Council in Baltimore stands in direct contradiction to the spirit of discourse and discernment that has propelled the development of Orthodox tradition.

Unfortunately, the language of the Synod’s statement offers a picture of church tradition that has nothing to do with its history, and aims to ossify poorly-understood notions as a collection of museum artifacts.

The phenomenon is the same: fear of change, derived from a misconception that the past holds all the keys to all questions—present and future—drives rejection of freedom. Fear of change replaces authority rooted in prayer, study, and open discourse with the whole Church with tyranny.

And fear of losing power drives repression, which is the source of threatening clergy and laity with disciplinary action—for what? For exercising academic freedom and affirming freedom of theological and intellectual discourse, which is the lifeblood of the Orthodox tradition.

As an independent and pan-Orthodox publication, we reaffirm our commitment to open dialogue and debate on all topics facing the Orthodox Church in the modern world, including gender and sexuality. We will continue to publish authors who seek to question and probe long-held assumptions in the pursuit of truth.

Fullness of Faith or Fullness of Fear?
By Gregory Tucker – 7/22/2022
publicorthodoxy.org/2022/07/22/fullness-of-faith-or-fullness-of-fear/

…It is therefore disheartening to read the latest statement of the Holy Synod of the Orthodox Church in America on same-sex relationships and sexual identity, which appears to intend to stifle genuine, faithful intellectual inquiry and cultivate a climate of fear.

Much in this text is unremarkable, little more than a rehearsal of apologetic tropes, and a repetition of statements issued previously. Nobody can honestly claim that the position of the Holy Synod of the OCA on these topics is unclear.

It is clear that the OCA’s Holy Synod not only considers the matter closed (an assertion that it is at liberty to make, however unwise) but now feels the need to threaten discipline against any member of the church who dares to suggest otherwise—at least, in print, preaching, or teaching. This statement therefore apparently seeks to terminate open and accountable theological discussion of one of the most pressing topics in contemporary church life.

There is no space in this essay even to begin to address the theological and pastoral questions that arise in relation to same-sex relationships and identities.

The second is that frameworks for the conceptualization of sexuality, sexual relations, sex, and gender are historically conditioned and thus subject to change—and this is true for everyone, past and contemporary Christian theologians included. In historical terms, it is simply indefensible to claim either that the Christian tradition (even in the pre-modern period) is completely unanimous or that the historical meaning of key terms, concepts, and discussions is immediately available to us without considered investigation.

It is, therefore, all the more perplexing to me that such a stark condemnation of discussion of these issues has been forthcoming. I can only understand it as the manifestation of a deep fear that has yet to be driven out by the light of faith.

Lamentably, this latest synodal ban occludes this truth and seeks to silence the relatively small and (frankly) quite successfully marginalized group of thinkers who are prepared to raise dissenting voices. This statement is to be rejected and resisted in the name of a perfect truth and love that casts out fear.

OCA Synod of Bishops Slams Door Shut on Gay, Lesbian, and Transgender Orthodox Christians
By Giacomo Sanfilippo – July 21, 2022
orthodoxyindialogue.com/2022/07/21/oca-synod-of-bishops-slams-door-shut-on-gay-lesbian-and-transgender-orthodox-christians/

Let Orthodoxy in Dialogue be the first to go on record “disobeying” the Holy Synod of Bishops of the Orthodox Church in America. Perhaps His Beatitude, Their Eminences, and Their Graces need reminding that demanding “obedience” is not how the Church works. Conciliar and Synodal decrees await reception by the whole body of the Church. We know from history that this does not take place overnight.

Orthodoxy in Dialogue rejects this Synodal directive and its false premises. The Synod takes none of the evolving science on sexuality and gender into account.

Orthodoxy in Dialogue will continue to serve as the Orthodox Church’s main public forum for the open theological, anthropological, spiritual, and pastoral exploration of sexual and gender diversity in human nature and in our life in Christ.

Orthodox Church’s Authoritarian Anti-LGBTQ Statement Poses Serious Threat to Academic Freedom
By Sarah Riccardi-Swartz – July 29, 2022
religiondispatches.org/orthodox-churchs-authoritarian-anti-lgbtq-statement-poses-serious-threat-to-academic-freedom/

… the Orthodox Church in America recently released an encyclical that, on the surface at least, recapitulates the long-held doctrines of the OCA concerning same-sex marriage and gay rights, reinforcing heterosexual hegemony as the only moral gateway to salvation.

Going beyond the edict and long-held doctrines, however, the Synod of the OCA also included a clause aimed at the suppression of any and all Orthodox academic research and free speech that relates to LGBTQAI persons and their rights:

As a social critic and caretaker of Orthodoxy, it’s clear that this latest OCA encyclical is not meant to simply reinforce the teachings of this Orthodox jurisdiction on sexuality and gender (much of which was already put forth at an AAC meeting in 1992, a period of time when the culture wars were also in full swing); rather, this newest statement is aimed specifically at silencing research and dialogue about the Orthodox LGTBQAI community.

In other words: Orthodox academic free speech is under threat.

While the document only uses the terms “same-sex” and “[those who] distort humanity’s God-given sexual identity” to refer, ostensibly, to all LGBTQAI+ persons, it’s quite direct in its theological refusal of anything outside of the singular notion of heterosexuality.

The matter of who might be corrected for their ideas and academic considerations is a bit murkier. Who will be subject to this punitive form of arrogant spirituality?

That the Synod of the OCA would renew their stance on sexuality and gender isn’t shocking; what does surprise me, however, is their use of reactionary and authoritarian tactics to take on what they appear to believe are moral thought crimes.

The disciplinary statement issued by the Synod suggests that they might be taking a page from the playbook of far-right Orthodox ideologues online who call for the excommunication and even “the purge” of American Orthodox scholars.

Totalitarianism, authoritarianism, fearful purity partitioning—we could call this latest move by the OCA hierarchy many things.

The author would like to thank Gregory Tucker and Robert Saler for their beneficial input.

Unprecedented Anti-LGBTQ Statement By Orthodox Church in America Should Be Christian Nationalist Warning Sign to US Orthodoxy
By Katherine Kelaidis – July 25, 2022
religiondispatches.org/unprecedented-anti-lgbtq-statement-by-orthodox-church-in-america-should-be-christian-nationalist-warning-sign-to-us-orthodoxy/

Late last week, the Orthodox Church in America, the second largest Orthodox church body in the country, issued an unprecedented statement seeking to silence any discussion about same-sex relationships and the sacramental inclusion of LGBTQ people in the life of the Orthodox Church. The statement is particularly chilling as it:

Those who refuse to comply are threatened with, “ecclesiastical discipline.” In short, this statement represents a clear shot across the bow, not only of LGBTQ people and their allies, but of freedom of thought and expression within the OCA, and perhaps in the Orthodox Christian world more broadly.

While it’s difficult to pinpoint a single “triggering event” for the release of this statement, it should be noted that earlier this month Archbishop Elpidophoros, the head of the Greek Orthodox Archdioceses of North America (GOA), the largest American Orthodox jurisdiction, presided over the baptism of twins born to a Greek-American gay couple. As is entirely predictable at this point, while the Archbishop’s decision won praise in many quarters, it was roundly and brutally condemned by conservatives throughout the Orthodox world, including with the jurisdiction he heads.

Whatever the motivation, the OCA Synod’s statement is the most recent, and arguably egregious, incident in what can only be described as a concerted takeover by extremists of the OCA, once among the most progressive Orthodox bodies in the world.

Over the past decade, the OCA has continued to follow the path that Metropolitan Jonah laid for it. It should not go unnoticed that Metropolitan Tikhon, the current head of the OCA, is also a convert from the Episcopal Church, and one who seems equally fixated on culture war issues—particular, abortion and same-sex marriage—as his predecessor.

Of course the Holy Synod of the OCA doesn’t want to have a conversation. They want to simply crush opposition and silence the debate. In doing so, they’re leaning into a brand of authoritarianism that would make even the imperial Orthodox leaders of old blush.

To Baptize or Not: God’s Love and Image
By Dcn. Nicholas Denysenko – July 25, 2022
publicorthodoxy.org/2022/07/26/to-baptize-or-not/

… The outcry over the decision to baptize these children [surrogate babies of homosexual “married” men] represents today’s zeitgeist. At the official level, many of the world’s Orthodox Churches have taken sides in the culture wars on human sexual identity.

Orthodox rejection of same-sex attraction, relationships, and marriage categorizes LGBTQI people as a special type of sinners that warrants expulsion from the community.

The official Church teaching on homosexuality does not represent a consensus within the Church.

Many theologians believe that the issue is unresolved and requires much more study, consultation with the scientific community, prayer, and reflection, even if synods [referring to OCA Synod specifically] attempt to mute public theological discussion of the topic.

The homophobic spirit of some Orthodox who have a binary view of the world (e.g., saints or sinners) diverts attention away from the truly pastoral issue at hand: the relationship between God and the children of this couple, and any other couple or single parent for that matter.

—————————————————
(Minor organizational edits and bolding of key words and/or phrases done by blog editors done to enhance readability.)

Scandalous Activists Attack OCA Synod For Rejecting Same-Sex Unions and LGBTQ Identities

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail

20 thoughts on “Scandalous Activists Attack OCA Synod For Rejecting Same-Sex Unions and LGBTQ Identities”

  1. One of the heretics notes that this is a shot across the bow. What is needed now is a full broadside (e.g., excommunication).The sooner we rid ourselves of these people, the better. God forgive them.

    Reply
  2. Not to be outdone, vagante bishop Lazar Puhalo voiced his displeasure and loathing of the OCA Synod’s statement:

    FB Post – 8/1/2022
    “With God’s help, I would like to present an Orthodox Christian understanding of marriage that does not involve any hatred or malice toward anyone and does not display a severe anxiety disorder.

    We could say much more but this is sufficient to demonstrate that we can only accept within the Church the marriage of a man and a woman. We do not have to be vulgar, mean-minded, hateful and malicious when we say this. This is quite sufficient to demonstrate our position. It is a shame to see a ship sailing on a sea of hypocrisy, driven by a sail of bigotry, with the wind of an unresolved anxiety disorder pushing it.

    It seems to me that spouting all of that hatred and malice, that vulgar mean-mindedness crosses the boundary into blasphemy when it is done in the name of the Church, the body of Christ, not the arbiter of civil and secular law. Even Paul made clear that he was not a judge of those outside the Church.” – Vladika Lazar Puhalo (FB post 8/1/2022)

    FB Post – 8/1/2022
    “We need to preach the gospel again instead of making public statements that give people lists of persons they are supposed to hate. Many of the statements that are being made public today sound more like untreated anxiety complexes them any kind of spiritual guidance or statements.” – Vladika Lazar Puhalo (FB post 8/1/2022)

    FB Post – 7/30/2022
    “I have seen some open letters from those most concerned about the synod’s recent decree concerning same-sex marriages. While I will agree that it was not at all necessary for this decree to be so full of hatred and malice, the fact is that the Orthodox Church does have a clear theological position about marriage…” – Vladika Lazar Puhalo (FB post 7/30/2022)

    Reply
  3. Evil at its most arrogant and depraved. Christ admonished sinners to repent and “sin no more.” Now, the teachings of classical philosophers and Church Fathers are swept aside in the cesspit universities that instead encourage intellectual apologies for debauchery, divorced from the highest achievements in learning and tradition that God has graced us to discern.

    Under the malevolent masquerade of cultic buzzwords like “inclusion” and “diversity” and “intersectionality,” these willing agents of Satan attempt to seduce the reasonable and the faithful under a pretense of “progress” that is nothing other than decadence in deceptive disguise. Such terms and words are a direct product of concerted efforts to control and distort the power of language and thus delude the everyday person, the emotionally vulnerable, and unstable into mistaking good for evil and evil for good. It is a vile trick as ancient as the human race itself, a cunning word-game intended to degrade and sow evil in our midst.

    Our spirits, our selves, our families, and our children are under direct and vicious attack from these merchants of death, these soul-murderers. When will the churches rise up and reject the unrepentant wickedness of the world in unmistakable language that unites all who are devoted to Christ and His Gospel without compromise? He Himself did not hesitate to take-up a whip and physically scourge willful evildoers until they fled in terror from the holy places of God.

    We need to do what we must to protect our loved ones and their souls before all is lost to apathy and perversion. Toss these people from our midst. Spit them out! Evict them from the sanctuaries unless or until they repent in sackcloth and ashes.

    Compromise = Soul Death in these darkest and most insidious of days. I can only look to Christ and the Panagia and the saints with trust, now, because I truly do not know where the next “wolf in sheep’s clothing” may turn up. Terrifying.

    Reply
  4. A big Thank You to Fr. Ioannes and the editors at Orthodox Network for doing this work to defend the Church teaching and warn the entire Church about these things. Sadly many Orthodox are not aware of how corrupt these pro-homosexual academics have become.

    Reply
      • Thank you for your many battles against the enemies of Christ’s Church.

        “Fight the good fight of the faith…..” “For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places.”

        These battles will only escalate as the state moves to declare opposition to these agendas “hate crimes” and such. Thank you and others for their courage.

        Reply
  5. “As the Prophets saw, as the Apostles taught, as the Church has received, as the Teachers express in dogma, as the inhabited world understands together with them, as grace illumines, as the truth makes clear, as error has been banished, as wisdom makes bold to declare, as Christ has assured,

    So we think, so we speak, so we preach, honouring Christ our true God, and his Saints, in words, in writings, in thoughts, in sacrifices, in churches, in icons, worshiping and revering the One as God and Lord, and honouring them because of their common Lord as those who are close to Him and serve Him, and giving to them due veneration.

    This is the faith of the Apostles;
    This is the faith of the Fathers;
    This is the faith of the Orthodox;
    This faith that established the universe!

    (The Synodikon of Orthodoxy, 7th Ecumenical Council, 843 AD)

    Reply
  6. My opinion is that if these critics of the OCA SYNOD Declaration publicly announce that THEY teach “Orthodox Theology” but clearly oppose Orthodoxy, using sophistry (the twisting of the words of Scripture, the Fathers etc. ie heresy), should be, (if members of the O. Church) expelled from the Church and if they have some sort of diploma in Theology from an Orthodox Theological Institution, it ought to be taken back for their unworthiness to hold such a diploma. I will not hold my breath, though….

    Reply
  7. Denysenko is falsely accusing the OCA Synod of “censorship” on his Facebook page. What else can we expect from a close friend of Inga Leonova, George Demacopolous, and Aristotle Papanikolaou. You hang around with cheerleaders activists that want women priests and bishops, same-sex marriage in church, homosexuality and LGBTQ+ normalized, you eventually start singing the same heretical and homosexualist tune.

    Nicholas Denysenko
    July 23 at 8:38 AM
    In response to the new censorship now codified by a certain organization, I cite Orwell:
    “Power is in tearing human minds to pieces and putting them together again in new shapes of your own choosing.”’

    Just remember, good people, that God always honors our freedom, and God is much “bigger” than any statement we compose.

    Exercise your freedom without fear. God is with you. And God does not wear black robes.

    Reply
  8. It went further downhill from there. Inga Leonova then responded to Denysenko’s post with this lovely comment directed at all the bishops in the OCA Synod:

    Inga Leonova
    They aren’t good people. They are terrified impotents that we ourselves invest with unlimited power. It is on us as much as on them.

    Reply
  9. The conversation between Katie Kelaidis (Katherine Kelaidis) and Nicholas Denysenko continued on Facebook. It reveals the depth of the confusion and lack of Orthodox spirit these activists have absorbed. They are dead-set on shoving homosexuality and same-sex marriage into the Orthodox Church.

    Katie Kelaidis
    Tracey D. Edson I am going to take a stab here: The Orthodox Church does not permit marital sex primarily for the purpose of procreation. Instead, the Church understands that sex can create and manifest love, intimacy, and joy when it occurs in the context of a relationship focused upon Christ and salvation (ie marriage). The blessing of the sexual relationship within marriage is a repudiation of gnosticism, announcing that our bodies are an important part of sacrificial love and agape-union. Under this rubric, I see no reason why homosexual activity would be any different. In fact, given our historical understanding of marital sex, it seems to me the “compassionate” position that sexual orientation is an immutable characteristic (virtually established fact at this point) but that gay and lesbian people are by virtue of their orientation called to celibacy is in fact extremely pernicious. Hetrosexuals called to lifelong celibacy are commonly and historically understood to have a call to monasticism (another salvific community focused upon the totally giving of self, including the body).

    When we tell gay and lesbian people that, with or without a monastic vocation, they are meant for lifelong celibacy, we are telling them they have been created in such a way that the only total (body- mind-spirit) love which they are capable of giving and receiving with another human being is inherently defective. That they are ontologically excluded from participating in the very kind of human relationships we know to be conducive to theosis. I know many gay and lesbian couples whose love for each other and lives together mirror the kind of sacrificial and self-emptying love that the Church teaches marriage should push us toward. The idea that their bodies should be excluded from that love and life seems to be the absolute definition of a gnostic belief.

    Nicholas Denysenko
    Katie Kelaidis I think part of your argument can be simplified accordingly – sexual relations and physical intimacy are part of committed companionship. It is not solely for procreation. We keep forgetting that our lifespans are much longer now. What happens to folks who are not ‘called’ to be alone or single? It may not be smart for some people to force marriage at a certain age and in certain circumstances (I’m not talking about single people in their late 20’s-to about 40 who have no attachments).

    We have no imagination, no mercy for those who fall outside of the margins of happy, monogamous marital life. Either be celibate, or force marriage. And then we wonder why they feel alienated from the Church (not from God, but the Church)!

    Katie Kelaidis
    Nicholas Denysenko no imagination. The fact the teaching of the Church re sexuality is so far removed from reality is really an indictment of the teaching. It’s not a perfect book, but have you read Nadia Bolz Weber’s most recent book called A Sexual Reformation?

    Reply
  10. The Wheel has got to be in honor of Simon the magician that the apostle contended with. The wheel was supposedly a flying machine and was utilized by one of Simon the magicians followers an Irish druid Maig Ruith the slave of the wheel.

    Reply
  11. Thank you, and your contributors for your continued fight to defend Christ’s Church against it enemies.

    “Fight the good fight of the faith.” “For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places.” (1 Timothy 6:12 / Ephesians 6:12)

    These are only the opening salvos of those who would corrupt the Church and her faithful. The battles will intensify as the state declares opposition to “gay” rights, abortion, and other secular humanist causes “hate crimes” and such.

    Reply
  12. “inside and outside the Orthodox Church” I would say it seems obvious that ANYONE, regardless of baptism, clerical, or hierarchical status who denies the doctrines taught by Holy Scripture and by the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church from the beginning is OUTSIDE the Orthodox Church, having removed themselves even if the Church has not officially removed them.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

15 − eleven =